WASHINGTON (AP) — Apple
Inc. CEO Tim Cook acknowledged to employees Monday that “it does not
feel right” to refuse to help the FBI hack a locked iPhone used by a
gunman in the San Bernardino mass shootings. But he said that to do so
would threaten data security for millions and “everyone’s civil
liberties.”
“We have no tolerance or sympathy for terrorists,”
Cook wrote in an early morning email addressed to the Apple “Team.”
“When they commit unspeakable acts like the tragic attacks in San
Bernardino, we work to help the authorities pursue justice for the
victims.”
But he reiterated the company’s position that to hack
the San Bernardino gunman’s phone would ultimately risk “security of
hundreds of millions of law-abiding people.”
Cook’s
email came just hours after FBI director James Comey said in an online
post that Apple owes it to the San Bernardino victims to cooperate and
said the dispute wasn’t about creating legal precedent.
The FBI “can’t look the survivors in the eye, or ourselves in the mirror, if we don’t follow this lead,” Comey said.
The
iPhone used by Syed Farook, who along with his wife killed 14 people in
the Dec. 2 rampage, was locked. At the government’s request, a Federal
magistrate judge has ordered Apple to help the FBI hack into the
password-protected phone.
The
case has sparked nationwide debate over digital privacy and national
security. Apple, in its message to employees, appeared to be sensitive
to criticism that the company is simply trying to protect its
proprietary business.
“Apple is a uniquely American company,” Cook
wrote. “It does not feel right to be on the opposite side of the
government in a case centering on the freedoms and liberties that
government is meant to protect.” But he said, “this case is about much
more than a single phone or a single investigation, so when we received
the government’s order we knew we had to speak out.”
Comey, in a
statement posted on the Lawfare blog, sought to defend the FBI demand
for access to the iPhone as well as counter Apple’s arguments that the
request risks threatening the digital privacy of Apple customers all
over the world.
“We simply
want the chance, with a search warrant, to try to guess the terrorist’s
passcode without the phone essentially self-destructing and without it
taking a decade to guess correctly. That’s it,” Comey wrote in a
four-paragraph statement. “We don’t want to break anyone’s encryption or
set a master key loose on the land.”
Cook’s message to employees
had “Thank you for your support,” in the subject line. He told employees
that the company believes abiding by the judge’s order would set a
dangerous precedent that would essentially create a backdoor to the
encrypted iPhone. That would set “a dangerous precedent that threatens
everyone’s civil liberties,” he said.
An iPhone is seen in Washington, Wednesday, Feb. 17, 2016. The San Bernardino County-owned iPhone at …
An accompanying
question-and-answer posting for customers acknowledges that while it is
technically possible for Apple to do what the judge ordered, that it’s
“something we believe is too dangerous to do.”
Apple
also points to the difficulty of keeping such a “master key” safe once
it has been created. The government has said that Apple could keep the
specialized technology it would create to help officials hack the phone —
bypassing a security time delay and feature that erases all data after
10 consecutive, unsuccessful attempts to guess the unlocking passcode.
This would allow the FBI to use technology to rapidly and repeatedly
test numbers.
Cook said that
if the company’s engineers were to do as ordered, Apple would do its
best to protect the technology, but that the company “would be
relentlessly attacked by hackers and cybercriminals.”
“The only
way to guarantee such a powerful tool isn’t abused and doesn’t fall into
the wrong hands is to never create it,” Apple said. The company has
until Friday to formally protest the ruling in court.
The case
would not have existed if the county government that owned the iPhone
had installed a feature on it that would have allowed the FBI to easily
and immediately unlock the phone. San Bernardino County had bought the
technology, known as mobile device management from MobileIron Inc., but
never installed it on any of the inspectors’ phones, including Farook’s,
said county spokesman David Wert said.
There is no countywide policy on the matter and departments make their own decisions, he said.
The service costs $4 per month per phone.