As i was trying to make more research about the Zion-elders i happened to get this....

WORLD CONQUEST THROUGH WORLD JEWISH GOVERNMENT

THE PROTOCOLS
OF THE LEARNED ELDERS
OF ZION
Visiting "The Protocols"

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Preface
Introduction
Who are the Elders?
Protocol I The Basic Doctrine
Protocol II Economic Wars
Protocol III Methods of Conquest
Protocol IV Materialism Replaces Religion
Protocol V Despotism and Modern Progress
Protocol VI Take-Over Technique
Protocol VII World-Wide Wars
Protocol VIII Provisional Government
Protocol IX Re-education
Protocol X Preparing for Power
Protocol XI The Totalitarian State
Protocol XII Control of the Press
Protocol XIII Distractions
Protocol XIV Assault on Religion
Protocol XV Ruthless Suppression
Protocol XVI Brainwashing
Protocol XVII Abuse of Authority
Protocol XVIII Arrest of Opponents
Protocol XIX Rulers and People
Protocol XX Financial Programme
Protocol XXI Loans and Credit
Protocol XXII Power of Gold
Protocol XXIII Instilling Obedience
Protocol XXIV Qualities of the Ruler

Back to Table of Contents/ . . .

PREFACE

(Translated by Victor E. Marsden)

The author of this translation of the famous Protocols was himself a victim of the Revolution. He had lived for many years in Russia and was married to a Russian lady. Among his other activities in Russia he had been for a number of years a Russian Correspondent of the MORNING POST, a position which he occupied when the Revolution broke out, and his vivid descriptions of events in Russia will still be in the recollection of many of the readers of that Journal. Naturally he was singled out for the anger of the Soviet. On the day that Captain Cromie was murdered by Jews, Victor Marsden was arrested and thrown into the Peter-Paul Prison, expecting every day to have his name called out for execution. This, however, he escaped, and eventually he was allowed to return to England very much of a wreck in bodily health. However, he recovered under treatment and the devoted care of his wife and friends. One of the first things he undertook, as soon as he was able, was this translation of the Protocols. Mr. Marsden was eminently well qualified for the work. His intimate acquaintance with Russia, Russian life and the Russian language on the one hand, and his mastery of a terse literary English style on the other, placed him in a position of advantage which few others could claim. The consequence is that we have in his version an eminently readable work, and though the subject-matter is somewhat formless, Mr. Marsden's literary touch reveals the thread running through the twenty-four Protocols.
It may be said with truth that this work was carried out at the cost of Mr. Marsden's own life's blood. He told the writer of this Preface that he could not stand more than an hour at a time of his work on it in the British Museum, as the diabolical spirit of the matter which he was obliged to turn into English made him positively ill.
Mr. Marsden's connection with the MORNING POST was not severed by his return to England, and he was well enough to accept the post of special correspondent of that journal in the suite of H.R.H., the Prince of Wales on his Empire tour. From this he returned with the Prince, apparently in much better health, but within a few days of his landing he was taken suddenly ill, and died after a very brief illness.
May this work be his crowning monument! In it he has performed an immense service to the English-speaking world, and there can be little doubt that it will take its place in the first rank of the English versions of "THE PROTOCOLS of the Meetings of the LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION."

---

Back to Table of Contents/ . . .

INTRODUCTION

Of the Protocols themselves little need be said in the way of introduction. The book in which they are embodied was first published in the year 1897 by Philip Stepanov for private circulation among his intimate friends. The first time Nilus published them was in 1901 in a book called The Great Within the Small and reprinted in 1905. A copy of this is in the British Museum bearing the date of its reception, August 10, 1906. All copies that were known to exist in Russia were destroyed in the Kerensky regime, and under his successors the possession of a copy by anyone in Soviet land was a crime sufficient to ensure the owner's of being shot on sight. The fact is in itself sufficient proof of the genuineness of the Protocols. The Jewish journals, of course, say that they are a forgery, leaving it to be understood that Professor Nilus, who embodied them in a work of his own, had concocted them for his own purposes.
Mr. Henry Ford, in an interview published in the New York WORLD, February 17th, 1921, put the case for Nilus tersely and convincingly thus:

"The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY FIT IT NOW."

Indeed they do!
The word "Protocol" signifies a precis gummed on to the front of a document, a draft of a document, minutes of proceedings. In this instance, "Protocol" means minutes of the proceedings of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion. These Protocols give the substance of addresses delivered to the innermost circle of the Rulers of Zion. They reveal the converted plan of action of the Jewish Nation developed through the ages and edited by the Elders themselves up to date. Parts and summaries of the plan have been published from time to time during the centuries as the secrets of the Elders have leaked out. The claim of the Jews that the Protocols are forgeries is in itself an admission of their genuineness, for they NEVER ATTEMPT TO ANSWER THE FACTS corresponding to the THREATS which the Protocols contain, and, indeed, the correspondence between prophecy and fulfillment is too glaring to be set aside or obscured. This the Jews well know and therefore evade.
Captain A.H.M. Ramsay records in his classic, The Nameless War: "According to a letter published in "Plain English" (a weekly review published by the North British Publishing Co. and edited by the late Lord Alfred Douglas) on 3rd September, 1921:-
"The Learned Elders have been in existence for a much longer period than they have perhaps suspected. My friend, Mr. L. D. van Valckert, of Amsterdam, has recently sent me a letter containing two extracts from the Synagogue at Mulheim. The volume in which they are contained was lost at some period during the Napoleonic Wars, and has recently come into Mr. van Valckert's possession. It is written in German, and contains extracts of letters sent and received by the authorities of the Mulheim Synagogue. The first entry he sends me is of a letter received:-
16th June, 1647.
From O.C. (i.e. Oliver Cromwell), by Ebenezer Pratt.
"In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England: This however impossible while Charles living.
Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape."
In reply was dispatched the following:-
12th July, 1647.
To O.C. by E. Pratt.
"Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and Jews admitted. Assassination too dangerous. Charles shall be given opportunity to escape: His recapture will make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences."
Captain Ramsay quotes Isaac Disraeli, father of Benjamin, Earl of Beaconsfield, Britain's first Jewish Prime Minister, in his two volume "Life of Charles I", published in 1851: "The English Revolution under Charles I was unlike any preceding one . . . From that time and event we contemplate in our history the phases of revolution." There were many more to follow on similar lines, notably in France. In 1897 a further important clue to these mysterious happenings fell into Gentile hands in the shape of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
In that document we read this remarkable sentence: "Remember the French Revolution, the secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was entirely the work of our hands." (See Protocol No. III, XIV).
In 1865 a certain Jewish Rabbi named Rzeichorn delivered a speech at Prague. It is a very accurate summary of many aspects of the Protocols which would come to light several decades later and was published eleven years later by Sir John Radcliff, who was assassinated shortly afterwards, giving testimony to the powers of the secret organisation of inner elite Jewry even then.
The presumption is strong that the Protocols were issued, or reissued, at the First Zionist Congress held at Basle in 1897 under the presidency of the Father of Modern Zionism, the late Theodore Herzl.
There has been recently published a volume of Herzl's "Diaries," a translation of some passages which appeared in the JEWISH CHRONICLE of July 14, 1922. Herzl gives an account of his first visit to England in 1895, and his conversation with Colonel Goldsmid, a Jew brought up as a Christian, an officer in the English Army, and at heart a Jew Nationalist all the time. Goldsmid suggested to Herzl that the best way of expropriating the English aristocracy, and so destroying their power to protect the people of England against Jew domination, was to put excessive taxes on the land. Herzl thought this an excellent idea, and it is now to be found definitely embodied in Protocol VI!
The above extract from Herzl's DIARY is an extremely significant bit of evidence bearing on the existence of the Jew World Plot and authenticity of the Protocols, but any reader of intelligence will be able from his own knowledge of recent history and from his own experience to confirm the genuineness of every line of them, and it is in the light of this LIVING comment that all readers are invited to study Mr. Marsden's translation of this terribly inhuman document.
Here is what Dr. Ehrenpreis, Chief Rabbi of Sweden, said in 1924, concerning the Protocols: "Long have I been well acquainted with the contents of the Protocols, indeed for many years before they were ever published in the Christian press. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were in point of fact not the original Protocols at all, but a compressed extract of the same. Of the 70 Elders of Zion, in the matter of origin and of the existence of the original Protocols, there are only ten men in the entire world who know.
I participated with Dr. Herzl in the first Zionist Congress which was held in Basle in 1897. Herzl was the most prominent figure at the Jewish World Congress. Herzl foresaw, twenty years before we experienced them, the revolution which brought the Great War, and he prepared us for that which was to happen. He foresaw the splitting up of Turkey, that England would obtain control of Palestine. We may expect important developments in the world."
And here is another very significant circumstance.The present successor of Herzl, as leader of the Zionist movement, Dr. Weizmann, quoted one of these sayings at the send-off banquet given to Chief Rabbi Hertz on October 6, 1920. The Chief Rabbi was on the point of leaving for HIS Empire tour of H.R.H., the Prince of Wales. And this is the "saying" of the Sages which Dr. Weizmann quoted: "A beneficent protection which God has instituted in the life of the Jew is that He has dispersed him all over the world." (JEWISH GUARDIAN, Oct. 8, 1920.)
Now compare this with the last clause of but one of Protocol XI.

"God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of dispersion, and from this, which appears to all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth all our strength, which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world."

The remarkable correspondence between these passages proves several things. It proves that the Learned Elders exist. It proves that Dr. Weizmann knows all about them. It proves that the desire for a "National Home" in Palestine is only camouflage and an infinitesimal part of the Jew's real object. It proves that the Jews of the world have no intention of settling in Palestine or any separate country, and that their annual prayer that they may all meet "Next Year in Jerusalem" is merely a piece of their characteristic make-believe. It also demonstrates that the Jews are now a world menace, and that the Aryan races will have to domicile them permanently out of Europe..

---

Back to Table of Contents/ . . .

WHO ARE THE ELDERS?

This is a secret which has not been revealed. They are the Hidden Hand. They are not the "Board of Deputies" (the Jewish Parliament in England) or the "Universal Israelite Alliance" which sits in Paris. But the late Walter Rathenau of the Allgemeiner Electricitaets Gesellschaft has thrown a little light on the subject and doubtless he was in possession of their names, being, in all likelihood, one of the chief leaders himself. Writing in the WIENER FREIE PRESSE, December 24, 1912, he said:

"Three hundred men, each of whom knows all the others, govern the fate of the European continent, and they elect their successors from their entourage."

In the year 1844, on the eve of the Jewish Revolution of 1848, Benjamin Disraeli, whose real name was Israel, and who was a "damped," or baptized Jew, published his novel, CONINGSBY, in which occurs this ominous passage:

"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."

And he went on to show that these personages were all Jews.
Now that Providence has brought to the light of day these secret Protocols all men may clearly see the hidden personages specified by Disraeli at work "behind the scenes" of all the Governments. This revelation entails on all peoples the grave responsibility of examining and revising AU FOND their attitude towards the Race and Nation which boasts of its survival over all Empires.

Notes I. - "Agentur" and "The Political."

There are two words in this translation which are unusual, the word "AGENTUR" and "political" used as a substantive, AGENTUR appears to be a word adopted from the original and it means the whole body of agents and agencies made use of by the Elders, whether members of the tribe or their Gentile tools.
By "the Political" Mr. Marsden means, not exactly the "body politic" but the entire machinery of politics.

Notes II - The Symbolic Snake of Judaism.

Protocol III opens with a reference to the Symbolic Snake of Judaism. In his Epilogue to the 1905 Edition of the Protocols, Nilus gives the following interesting account of this symbol:
"According to the records of secret Jewish Zionism, Solomon and other Jewish learned men already, in 929BC, thought out a scheme in theory for a peaceful conquest of the whole universe by Zion.

"As history developed, this scheme was worked out in detail and completed by men who were subsequently initiated in this question. These learned men decided by peaceful means to conquer the world for Zion with the slyness of the Symbolic Snake, whose head was to represent those who have been initiated into the plans of the Jewish administration, and the body of the Snake to represent the Jewish people—the administration was always kept secret, EVEN FROM THE JEWISH NATION ITSELF. As this Snake penetrated into the hearts of the nations which it encountered. it undermined and devoured all the non-Jewish power of these States. It is foretold that the Snake has still to finish its work, strictly adhering to the designed plan, until the course which it has to run is closed by the return of its head to Zion and until, by this means, the Snake has completed its round of Europe and has encircled it—and until, by dint of enchaining Europe, it has encompassed the whole world. This it is to accomplish by using every endeavor to subdue the other countries by an ECONOMICAL CONQUEST.

"The return of the head of the Snake to Zion can only be accomplished after the power of all the Sovereigns of Europe has been laid low, that is to say, when by means of economic crises and wholesale destruction effected everywhere, there shall have been brought about a spiritual demoralization and a moral corruption, chiefly with the assistance of Jewish women masquerading as French, Italians, etc.. These are the surest spreaders of licentiousness into the lives of the leading men at the heads of nations.

A map of the course of the Symbolic Snake is shown as follows: -

Its first stage in Europe was in 429BC in Greece, where, about the time of Pericles, the Snake first started eating into the power of that country. The second stage was in Rome in the time of Augustus, about 69BC. The third in Madrid in the time of Charles V, in AD1552. The fourth in Paris about 1790, in the time of Louis XVI. The fifth in London from 1814 onwards (after the downfall of Napoleon). The sixth in Berlin in 1871 after the Franco-Prussian war. The seventh in St. Petersburg, over which is drawn the head of the Snake under the date of 1881.

[This "Snake" is now being drawn through the Americas and in the United States of America, it has been partially identified as the "Council on Foreign Relations" (C.F.R.) and the "Trilateral Commission"].

All these States which the Snake traversed have had the foundations of their constitutions shaken, Germany, with its apparent power, forming no exception to the rule. In economic conditions, England and Germany are spared, but only till the conquest of Russia is accomplished by the Snake, on which at present [i.e., 1905] all its efforts are concentrated. The further course of the Snake is not shown on this map, but arrows indicate its next movement towards Moscow, Kieft and Odessa. It is now well known to us to what extent the latter cities form the centres of the militant Jewish race. Constantinople is shown as the last stage of the Snake's course before it reaches Jerusalem. (This map was drawn years before the occurrence of the "Young Turk"—i.e., Jewish—Revolution in Turkey).

Notes III. - The term "Goyim," meaning Gentile
or non-Jews, is used throughout the Protocols and is retained by Mr. Marsden.
przion1.htm

Read More

They’re After Your Hard-Earned Social Security and Medicare Benefits

Are you aware of the rancid Zionist scheme to steal hundreds of billions of dollars from your earned Social Security and Medicare? The elite want your money so they can fuel the five bloody and aggressive wars raging at this very moment in the Middle East.

Count’em—five wars: (1) Iraq; (2) Afghanistan; (3) Yemen; (4) Libya; (5) Pakistan. All going on simultaneously. And all for the cause of Zionism, Israel, and more wealth for Jewish bankers and plutocrats.

Discover the truth about the Zionist plot for a Greater Israel and why America is now involved in five wars in the Middle East.

America’s Security Not at Stake

These wars are not being fought to secure America’s safety and security. America’s citizens are not threatened by the poverty-stricken Arab countries thousands of miles distant. Thus, the only ones benefiting from this violence are the Jews. They are the ones who are intent on building up a socialist, theocratic empire called “Greater Israel.”

America is blowing over a trillion dollars a year to fight these five deadly, evil conflicts far from our shores. And the Israeli Beast is still not satisfied. The elite now demand that the U.S. attack Iran and Syria. The list of supposed “enemies” is never-ending. What country is next?—Turkey?...Egypt?...the Sudan?

America on Verge of Bankruptcy

The fact is, the United States is teetering on the verge of bankruptcy. The bogus “War on Terror” and the ramping up of the U.S. military invasion of the Middle East has already cost us a staggering five trillion dollars, and there’s no end in sight! The red ink of the budget deficit is spilling out onto the streets. The way Obama and the Congress—Republicans and Democrats—figure it, there’s only one way to pay for these bloody, unnecessary wars: “slash entitlements.” In other words—rob the average man and woman of what is due them.

That means huge cuts in Social Security and Medicare. That’s why the media, owned by Jewish big-wigs, keep repeating the mantra, “cut entitlements...cut entitlements.”

“It’s the only thing we can do,” the lying politicians claim. No one in the Jewish-controlled media or government has the guts to admit that, in fact, there is a far better way.

It is a fact that two elements—(1) War spending; and (2) Entitlements (Social Security and Medicare)—are the largest outlays in the federal budget. But the government spends twice as much on War (including so-called Homeland Security and Intelligence) as it does on Social Security and Medicare. Yet we are told that spending cuts must be made immediately only in entitlements.

According to the bureaucrats and politicians, all the excessive war spending must remain intact, even as it expands with each passing day.

A Financial Abyss

The truth is, the wasteful and bogus War on Terror is driving America into a hellish financial abyss. The whole economic system is about to go under. Already the national debt is such that, according to the Wall Street Journal, every man, woman, and child in America owes the unbelievable amount of $534,000. And that figure is going up, up, up every single day. All this red ink is going to end in an abysmal, monumental Great Depression unless...unless... the feds dramatically slice the budget and do it fast.

As I said, while the federal budget has plenty of waste in other categories of spending, there are only two places where there is sufficient money to meet the voracious credit demands of the U.S. Government—(1) War Spending; and (2) Entitlements.

Zionist shills like (left to right) Representatives Eric Cantor, Debbie Wasserman, Paul Ryan, and John Boehner in the House and Charles Schumer and John McCain in the Senate have already cut $800 billion from Social Security and Medicare and now want to steal even more billions from the people’s paid-for entitlements. Meanwhile, American troops are fighting and dying in five useless wars for Israel’s benefit in the Middle East, and the cost of these lethal conflicts is bankrupting our nation.

Bringing Back Sanity

Now, if sanity prevailed in this country, the angry American people would rise up as one and order the politicians: “Cut the nonsense. Bring our troops home. End the Satanic wars! And while you’re at it, send Janet Napolitano and her TSA crotch-grabbing pals at the airports packing. Dismantle the whole crazy, Big Brother Police State mess and return us to constitutional government.”

Presto! Deficit problem solved. No need to rob the taxpayer of his hard-earned Social Security and Medicare. Just end the war spending and bring our troops home. We’ll still have the world’s most powerful armed forces, but the troops will be here, in America, defending our borders, not bleeding and dying over in the Middle East massacring mostly innocent men, women, and children whose survivors end up hating us.

The Jewish Lobby Tells Congress What to Do

So, why not do this? Why not end the insanity? Well, simply put, the Zionist Jews won’t let us be sane! The White House and Congress are owned lock, stock, and barrel by the Jewish lobbyists. Congressman Paul Ryan, a Republican who is head of the budget committee in the House, and Republican House Speaker John Boehner and his sidekick, Rep. Eric Cantor, are in rapturous love with the Jewish lobbyists. Democrats—like Representatives Nancy Pelosi, Steny Hoyer, and Debbie Wasserman—likewise are recruits in Netanyahyu’s Jewish legions of deceit. AIPAC, the ADL, the AJC (American Jewish Congress) and the rest of the Jewish power elite have taken our politicians captive.

So here is the bottom line: Something in the budget has got to go, but the Jews are going to make sure that (1) Israel continues to get its plush foreign aid money; (2) America’s five wars in the Middle East and the buildup of a Greater Israel Empire continue; and (3) Anyone who votes against these pro-Jew death programs better kiss their House or Senate seat goodbye!

Robbing You and Me is Their Goal

That means, dear friends, that if anything gets cut in our federal budget, it’s gonna be the money owed the folks—you and me. And that means Social Security and Medicare entitlements are dead meat.

Please don’t be misled: You are entitled to these benefits. You and your employer paid in to these funds. This is not welfare. These are insurance programs that are owed you and me.

We Owe the Zionist Crooks Nothing

In contrast, you and I owe Israel and the Zionists not a cent! Nothing; nada; zilch; zero. For decades the cheaters and thieves in Washington, D.C. have been gobbling up our Social Security and Medicare payments and promising us insurance benefits in return. Now they want to change the rules, simply because their Zionist masters say so.

Well, friends, let’s surprise these rascals. Phone, email and write your representatives and give ’em a piece of your minds. Tell them they better not cut the Social Security and Medicare benefits that are owed Americans who have faithfully paid in to Social Security and Medicare all their lives.

Not only that, but we do not want our government to pay out Social Security and Medicare to aliens in our country illegally. I say, let Mexico—or whatever country they are a citizen of—take care of their retirement needs and let America take care of its own.

Thanks to our Zionist masters who occupy Washington, D.C., the United States has gotten involved in one Middle East conflict after another. The real purpose of these conflicts is to create a Greater Israel while stealing the oil resources of the invaded countries, further enriching Jewish banking interests. Over 1 million innocent men, women, and children have been killed, maimed, and injured. Torture is rampant by U.S. forces, the CIA, and the Israeli Mossad, and this has inflamed the whole Moslem world against the United States.

Bring the Troops Home Now!

The U.S. has over 100,000 troops in Afghanistan now and 45,000 more in Iraq. In all, we have troops stationed in 130 nations around the globe. This is nuts!

Isn’t it about time that we the people took charge and ended the baloney of the fictitious Osama bin Ladens and the nonexistent “Al Qaidas?” Let’s bring the American troops home from the dust-filled deserts of Iraq and Afghanistan and everywhere else they’re stationed.

Once the troops are back home, we can put tens of thousands of them down on the southern border. Yes, assign the good old U.S. army, the Marines, and the Air Force the task of enforcing our existing immigration laws.

Close the border, keep the invaders out, and that alone will save taxpayers tens of billions in wasted welfare dollars, medical costs, and education expenses now going to foreigners here illegally. This also will help solve our current deficit problem while keeping us safer and more prosperous.

Put A Stop to the Zionist Agenda

The Zionist agenda calls for the end of America as a nation. The unpatriotic American Jews who put Israel first and America last are traitors. They are demanding that America spend billions more hard-earned dollars we do not have arming Israeli marauders to the teeth. They are more than happy to see our young men and women in uniform fighting and dying in insane foreign wars to build up a militant and greedy empire for Israel.

Isn’t it time we said, No!, No!, and again No! to the Jewish miscreants and traitors and their lackeys in Washington, D.C. who are bankrupting America?

We Owe the Zionist Crooks Nothing

In contrast, you and I owe Israel and the Zionists not a cent! Nothing; nada; zilch; zero. For decades the cheaters and thieves in Washington, D.C. have been gobbling up our Social Security and Medicare payments and promising us insurance benefits in return. Now they want to change the rules, simply because their Zionist masters say so.

Well, friends, let’s surprise these rascals. Phone, email and write your representatives and give ’em a piece of your minds. Tell them they better not cut the Social Security and Medicare benefits that are owed Americans who have faithfully paid in to Social Security and Medicare all their lives.

Not only that, but we do not want our government to pay out Social Security and Medicare to aliens in our country illegally. I say, let Mexico—or whatever country they are a citizen of—take care of their retirement needs and let America take care of its own.

Thanks to our Zionist masters who occupy Washington, D.C., the United States has gotten involved in one Middle East conflict after another. The real purpose of these conflicts is to create a Greater Israel while stealing the oil resources of the invaded countries, further enriching Jewish banking interests. Over 1 million innocent men, women, and children have been killed, maimed, and injured. Torture is rampant by U.S. forces, the CIA, and the Israeli Mossad, and this has inflamed the whole Moslem world against the United States.

Bring the Troops Home Now!

The U.S. has over 100,000 troops in Afghanistan now and 45,000 more in Iraq. In all, we have troops stationed in 130 nations around the globe. This is nuts!

Isn’t it about time that we the people took charge and ended the baloney of the fictitious Osama bin Ladens and the nonexistent “Al Qaidas?” Let’s bring the American troops home from the dust-filled deserts of Iraq and Afghanistan and everywhere else they’re stationed.

Once the troops are back home, we can put tens of thousands of them down on the southern border. Yes, assign the good old U.S. army, the Marines, and the Air Force the task of enforcing our existing immigration laws.

Close the border, keep the invaders out, and that alone will save taxpayers tens of billions in wasted welfare dollars, medical costs, and education expenses now going to foreigners here illegally. This also will help solve our current deficit problem while keeping us safer and more prosperous.

Put A Stop to the Zionist Agenda

The Zionist agenda calls for the end of America as a nation. The unpatriotic American Jews who put Israel first and America last are traitors. They are demanding that America spend billions more hard-earned dollars we do not have arming Israeli marauders to the teeth. They are more than happy to see our young men and women in uniform fighting and dying in insane foreign wars to build up a militant and greedy empire for Israel.

Isn’t it time we said, No!, No!, and again No! to the Jewish miscreants and traitors and their lackeys in Washington, D.C. who are bankrupting America?

Read More

Sudan says it has South Sudan’s former rebel leader who fled

FILE---In this Saturday, Feb. 13, 2016 file photo, South Sudan’s rebel leader Riek Machar addresses a press conference in his private residence in Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa. Sudan announced Tuesday, Aug. 23, 2016, it was now hosting South Sudan’s former rebel leader and vice president, whose whereabouts had been unknown after he fled his country into neighboring Congo last week.Riek Machar needed “urgent medical attention,” government spokesman Ahmed Bilal Osman said in a statement carried by the SUNA news agency. (Mulugeta Ayene, File/Associated Press)

By Mohamed Osman | AP August 23 at 2:24 PM

KHARTOUM, Sudan — South Sudan’s former rebel leader and vice president who fled the country last week has re-emerged in neighboring Sudan, which announced Tuesday that he had needed “urgent medical attention.” Riek Machar’s whereabouts had been largely unknown for weeks, leaving an already fragile peace deal in limbo.
Machar’s condition was now stable, and he will stay “until he leaves the country for a destination of his choice to complete his medical treatment,” Sudan government spokesman Ahmed Bilal Osman said in a statement carried by the SUNA news agency.
Machar fled South Sudan’s capital last month amid renewed fighting, just months after he returned to the country to resume being vice president under a peace deal signed last year under international pressure to end a civil war.
Many of his bodyguards were shot dead in the July fighting that erupted outside the presidential compound where Machar and former rival President Salva Kiir were meeting on recent tensions.
His absence further weakened the peace deal, with Kiir quickly replacing Machar as vice president in a contested move.
A spokesman for Machar, James Gatdet Gak, confirmed via social media that Machar was in Khartoum and suffered from “exhaustion and a swollen leg,” and he thanked the Sudanese government for the medical care.
Osman, the government spokesman, said Sudan had recently accepted Machar for “purely humanitarian reasons” and promptly notified neighboring South Sudan’s government. He did not say how or when Machar had arrived.
Sudan’s foreign ministry spokesman had told The Associated Press on Saturday that Machar was not there.
South Sudan’s presidential spokesman, Ateny Wek Ateny, said the government was not aware that Machar was in Sudan and had no comment.
Last week, a spokesman for Machar announced that he had fled across the border into Congo after weeks of walking through the bush. The United Nations said it had arranged for its peacekeeping mission in Congo to fly Machar to a safe place away from the Congo-South Sudan border and that Machar was in the hands of Congolese authorities.
But Congo’s government last week said it had no knowledge of Machar being there.
It was not immediately clear whether Machar had plans to emerge from his treatment in Sudan to speak publicly.
South Sudan’s civil war began in December 2013 between armed supporters of rivals Kiir and Machar. Machar’s side has received ammunition, arms, uniforms and other supplies from Sudan, a U.N. panel of experts has reported .
Tens of thousands have been killed and more than 900,000 have fled the world’s youngest country, which was founded in 2011 after years of fighting for independence from Sudan.
___
Associated Press writer Justin Lynch in Juba, South Sudan, contributed to this report.
Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read More

Trump, Clinton spar over economic plans in dueling speeches

Published August 11, 2016

Just The Facts News

The 2016 presidential rivals set aside their latest campaign controversies Thursday to trade jabs on jobs, taxes and the economy -- with Donald Trump casting Hillary Clinton as bad for the housing industry and the Democratic nominee accusing her opponent of offering "no credible plans" for working Americans.
Clinton also tried to out-tough Trump on trade, vowing to beef up enforcement on trade rules and punish countries that violate them.
"Mr. Trump may talk a big game on trade, but his approach is based on fear, not strength," Clinton said in Michigan. "If Team USA was as fearful as Trump, Michael Phelps and Simone Biles would be cowering in the locker room, afraid to come out to compete."
Trump delivered an economic speech of his own earlier this week in Michigan. On Thursday, he also spoke to the National Association of Home Builders in Miami Beach, Fla., and decried the Obama administration’s increase in regulations on building properties.
“In the last five years, regulations on building … have increased by 29 percent,” he said.
Trump cited his family’s history in the industry and regaled the crowd with anecdotes of his father Fred’s homebuilding exploits. He told the association, though, that the regulation situation would only get worse if Clinton is elected in November.

2016 Election Headquarters

The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →

“And I will say this, and I say this to you very strongly, if short-circuit Hillary Clinton ever gets elected, it's only going to be worse. It is going to get worse. It's going to be four more years of Obama but it will be worse because she's mandated to go to the left, because 45 percent of Bernie's people -- they want her to head in that direction,” he said.
Clinton, meanwhile, detailed her economic package in a speech in Detroit, calling for the largest investment package since World War II, a "patriotic tax code" that would punish those companies sending jobs abroad, broadband in every home by 2020 and making America a “green energy super power.”
She also reached out to disenfranchised Republicans by saying “a big part of our plan will be unleashing the power of private sector to create more jobs at higher pay.”
She cited analysis that found Trump’s positions would lose over 3 million jobs, while hers would create over 10 million.
“When it comes to creating jobs, I would argue, it’s not even close,” she said, when comparing their two plans. “He hasn't offered any credible solutions for the very real economic challenges we face.”
She also said she would oppose any trade deals that would send American jobs abroad, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Clinton has opposed the deal in its current form after once calling it a "gold standard" agreement when she was secretary of state. Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe hinted last month that she may change her position when elected, although this was denied by the Clinton campaign.
“I’ll oppose it now, I'll oppose it after the election and I'll oppose it as president,” she said, also promising to stand up to China if they try and take advantage of American workers.
Clinton also took a shot at Trump for making certain items, such as suits and ties, in China and Mexico.
“One thing he could do to make America great is to make great things in America,” she joked.
Trump outlined his economic package in a speech Monday, pledging to cut taxes for businesses and workers, while proposing a three-bracket income tax system more in line with proposals by House Republicans than his previous plan. He also called for greater child care deductions for families.
Economic issues have frequently been pushed to the side amid controversies over remarks made by Trump -- as well as recurring controversies involving Clinton's email scandals and dealing between her State Department and family foundation.
At a Tuesday rally, Trump said there was no way to stop a future-President Hillary Clinton from packing the Supreme Court with anti-Second Amendment justices, “although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is…I don’t know.” Some saw the remarks as a joke about Clinton being assassinated, a claim that the Trump campaign has denied.
Trump has also faced more controversy after claiming that President Obama is “the founder” of ISIS, and Clinton its co-founder.

Read More

At least 4 dead, dozens wounded after coordinated bombings hit Thailand resort areas

Aug. 12, 2006: Investigators work at the scene of an explosion in the resort town of Hua Hin, 150 miles south of Bangkok, Thailand. (AP)

BANGKOK –  Coordinated explosions targeting some of Thailand's most popular resort cities and beach towns killed at least four people and wounded dozens more. Police said Friday that 10 foreigners were injured in the violence, some of the worst here since the military seized power in a coup two years ago.
It was not clear who was behind the attacks Thursday and Friday, but police ruled out links to international terrorism or a low-level insurgency in the country's Islamic south.
The timing and scope of the attacks suggested the bombs were set off by opponents of the Southeast Asian nation's ruling junta, which last weekend organized a successful referendum on a constitution that critics say will bolster the military's power for years to come.
The explosions all occurred south of Bangkok and several of the blasts — including one on Patong beach in the tourist town of Phuket, three in the seaside resort city of Hua Hin — appeared designed to strike the tourism industry.

Thailand's economy has sagged since the military seized power in a 2014 coup. But tourism has remained one of the few bright spots, with more than 14 million people visiting in 2016 so far — up from 12.5 million the year before.
Foreign governments, including the United States, issued warnings urging travelers to avoid affected areas.
Germany's Foreign Ministry said that three German citizens were among the injured. It gave no further details, and it was unclear which blast was responsible.
The most devastating explosions occurred overnight in Hua Hin on a busy street filled with bars and restaurants. One Thai woman was killed and about 20 people were wounded, half of them foreigners, according to Pol. Lt Chaiyot Tisawong.
Gen. Sithichai Srisopacharoenrath, the superintendent of police in Hua Hin, said the bombs were hidden inside potted plants and were set off by remote control, half an hour apart. He said a Samsung cell phone had been recovered that they believe was used to detonate at least one the bombs.
On Friday, debris and ball bearings could be seen strewn across the road as police investigated the scene. The blast damaged a pair of phone booths and shattered the window of a nearby Starbucks.
Many shops in the city center closed afterward and normally bustling streets were empty, for good reason: Hua Hin was hit again by another bomb that exploded Friday morning near a clock tower, killing one person and wounding four more.
Separate blasts were reported elsewhere in the south. One exploded on Phuket city's popular Patong beach, injuring one person. Two more detonated in front of two police stations half an hour apart in Surat Thani in southern Thailand, killing one and wounding three. And two bombs exploded outside a market in Phang Na, damaging two vehicles but causing no casualties.
Earlier Thursday, another bomb blew up in the southern province of Trang — full of beautiful beaches and tourist island — killing one person and injuring six, according to Thai press reports.
Trang is on the fringes of Thailand's deep south, where a low-level Muslim separatist insurgency had killed more than 5,000 people since 2004. Almost all the violence has been in the three southernmost provinces.
In Hua Hin, tourist Shane Brett told the Australian Broadcasting Corp. from his hotel room that there was panic after the first explosion there Thursday.
"I was at a bar in the main bar district in Hua Hin right outside the Hilton Hotel and at first I heard kind of a bang ... and everyone kind of panicked," Brett said.
He looked outside and saw people running. Half an hour later, heading back to his hotel, he saw "a good few people injured and the whole area just panicking ... the whole area was just shut down with police cars, ambulances."
Thailand has been plagued by political violence, including several bombings, since the populist billionaire Thaksin Shinawatra was ousted as prime minister in a 2006 military coup after demonstrations accused him of corruption, abuse of power and insulting King Bhumibol Adulyadej.
Thaksin's ouster set off sometimes bloody battles for power between his supporters and opponents, who include the military. The government of his sister Yingluck Shinawatra, who became prime minister in 2011, was toppled in the country's last coup in 2014.
On Sunday, Thai voters approved a referendum on a new constitution that is supposed to lead to an election next year. Critics say it is undemocratic and is fashioned to keep the military in control for at least five more years even if a free election is held.
In a speech Wednesday night, junta chief and Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha took credit for bringing stability back to Thailand after an extended period of unrest.
On Friday, Prayuth said the government was doing the best it "could to provide security to the country ... We have to band together and stay strong."
Col. Sansern Kaewkamnerd, a junta spokesman, said Prayuth "expressed his sadness over the unexpected and tragic incident (in Hua Hin)" and ordered police and soldiers in the area to step up security measures.
Friday's blast took place on the birthday of Thailand's Queen Sirikit. The junta has repeatedly said that defending the monarchy is a top priority, and the army and its allies are keen to ensure a smooth succession for Bhumibol, who is the world's longest reigning monarch.

Read More

Iran's ex-president Ahmadinejad asks Obama to 'fix' $2B Supreme Court ruling

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Iran's former hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sent a letter on Monday to President Barack Obama, asking him to "quickly fix" a U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowing families of people killed in attacks linked to Iran to collect damages from some $2 billion in frozen assets.
While writing that his letter "is by no means of (a) political nature," Ahmadinejad's message to Obama arrives amid swirling speculation that the hard-line politician may run as a candidate in Iran's presidential election next year.
It also comes as average Iranians largely have yet to see the benefits of Iran's nuclear deal with world powers -- something a discontent Ahmadinejad and other hard-liners could mine in any potential campaign against moderates.

In the letter, posted on a website associated with the former president's office, Ahmadinejad focuses on the Supreme Court's decision in April. The court's 6-2 ruling allows families of victims of the 1983 Marine barracks bombing in Beirut and other attacks linked to Iran to collect monetary damages from Iran.
At risk for Iran is $1.75 billion in bonds, plus accumulating interest, owned by Iran's Bank Markazi and held by Citibank in New York.
"It is the clear expectation of the Iranian nation that the particular case of property seizure ... be quickly fixed by your excellency and that not only the Iranian nation's rights be restored and the seized property released and returned, but also the damaged caused be fully compensated for," the letter said.
"I passionately advise you not to let the historical defamation and bitter incident be recorded under your name," Ahmadinejad added.
Ahmadinejad's letter was delivered to the Swiss Embassy in Tehran, which has overseen America's interests in the country in the years after the 1979 Islamic Revolution and U.S. Embassy takeover. Embassy officials declined to comment.
It's unclear what steps Ahmadinejad expects Obama to take. There was no immediate comment from the White House regarding the letter.
The timing of the letter, however, is interesting as Ahmadinejad's name continues to circulate as a possible challenger to moderate President Hassan Rouhani in Iran's coming May 19 election. Rouhani's administration negotiated the nuclear accord, which put limits on Iran's atomic program in exchange for the lifting of crippling economic sanctions.
While Ahmadinejad previously served two four-year terms, Iranian law calls only for a one-term cooling-off period before he's eligible to run again.
How Iranians would react to another Ahmadinejad run, however, remains to be seen if and when it happens.
Under his presidency, Iran found itself heavily sanctioned over the nuclear program as Ahmadinejad questioned the scale of the Holocaust and predicted the demise of Israel. His disputed 2009 re-election saw widespread protests and violence. Two of his former vice presidents have since been jailed for corruption.

Capital City	Tehran
Type of Government	Islamic Republic
Primary Languages	Persian
Currency	Iranian Rial

Population

79.1

million

GDP per Capita

$5,443

Land Area

628,783

square miles

Sources: World Bank: World Deve

Read More

Presidential

Clinton, Trump clash on economy

Hillary Clinton clashed from afar with Donald Trump on the economy Monday, accusing him of peddling “old, tired ideas” that benefit the “really wealthy” – after the Republican nominee hammered the Democrats' “job-killing” agenda in a speech of his own where he unveiled a revised plan to jolt the economy by slashing taxes and regulations.

Read More

North Korea

North Korea, China want to undo the Japan-South Korea Alliance that the US helped broker

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  

Now Playing North Korean missile lands near Japanese waters

\


With the world preoccupied by America’s raucous election, the U.K.’s vote to exit the E.U., and continued terrorism in Europe and the Middle East, North Korea fired a missile Wednesday more than 600 miles into Japanese waters, just 155 miles off its shores.
The launch defied a resolution approved in March by the United Nations, the fifth since 2006, that bars development of nuclear and ballistic missile technology and applies broad sanctions. In recent weeks, North Korea and China have been protesting plans by South Korea to deploy a missile defense system developed by the United States, and the missile launch may have been a reaction. But it seems much more.
North Korea and China have been deploying a strategy of undermining cooperation between the two largest democracies in the region, South Korea and Japan, which comprise the fulcrum for the Obama Administration’s “pivot to Asia.” Attacks on this alliance will almost certainly intensify as we approach Aug. 15, the 71^st anniversary of the surrender of Japan, ending World War II.
In December, the United States played a key role in helping South Korea and Japan forge an agreement to end a dispute involving so-called  “comfort women” that had been festering for decades. The Japanese government agreed to compensate Korean women who were used for sex by Japanese troops, and Prime Minister Shinzo Abe renewed an apology.
The agreement had far broader implications. It was a major step in ending the animosity between the two countries that had seriously infected economic and security relations. Between 2012 and 2014, for example, Japan-South Korea trade fell 17 percent, and tourism dropped sharply.
In headlines, the Guardian newspaper of Britain called the so-called comfort women deal “a triumph for Japan and the U.S.,” and The Washington Post concluded that it “offers strategic benefit to U.S. in Asia-Pacific.” President Obama intervened several times personally during the two years of negotiations, trying to bring Abe and South Korean President Park Geun-hye closer to together. He phoned to congratulate the two on the agreement, praising them for “having the courage and vision to forge a lasting settlement to this difficult issue.”
Also facilitating the agreement was Mark Lippert, the U.S. ambassador to South Korea, who was slashed in March 2015 by a knife-wielding attacker.
According to the BBC, the accused South Korean man, Kim Ki-jong, attacked the Japanese ambassador to South Korea in 2010 and later tried to erect a memorial altar in the heart of Seoul to the late North Korean dictator Kim Jong-il.
Obama brought Park and Abe together during a nuclear summit meeting at the residence of the U.S. Ambassador to The Hague in 2014. It was the first time the two Asian leaders had met despite being in office for more than a year. North Korea’s aggressive policies were the backdrop for the comfort women talks.
Abe and Park spoke within 24 hours of a North Korean nuclear test that occurred shortly after the comfort women agreement. That contact showed that working through the wartime claims deal had helped establish “a relationship of trust,” said a special adviser to Abe.
But trust and unity between South Korea and Japan, especially with U.S. encouragement, is precisely what the North Koreans oppose, and they continue to try to drive a wedge between the two nations. North Korea immediately attacked the December agreement and mobilized its allies.
The Association of Koreas in Japan for Peaceful Reunification, for example, issued a statement saying: “For South Korea, there is no more humiliating diplomacy than to reach such a deal with Japan.”
Now, more than seven months after the agreement was reached, the response to “an issue that the Korean media often treated as central to South Korean identity” seems to have “dropped out of the newspapers,” according to Robert Kelly, who teaches at Pusan University.
The truth is that the comfort women issue has been a favorite hot-button issue for politicians across Asia, but now that it’s been settled in South Korea and Japan, you can still expect North Korea and China to exploit it.
James K. Glassman served as U.S. Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs (2008-09).

Read More

Iran Is Ready To Attack Israel

 

The tension between Israel and Iran appears to be heightening. Hossein Salami, deputy commander of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), recently said: “Hezbollah has 100,000 missiles that are ready to hit Israel to liberate the occupied Palestinian territories if the Zionist regime repeats its past mistakes.”

He added: “Today, the grounds for the annihilation and collapse of the Zionist regime are [present] more than ever.” Salami warned that if Israel made the “wrong move,” it would come under attack.

A few weeks ago, a senior adviser to the IRGC’s elite Quds Force, Ahmad Karimpour, said Iran could destroy Israel “in less than eight minutes” if Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei gave the order.

Rhetoric and Iran’s Military Capabilities

There are several reasons why Iran’s repeated anti-Israel statements may be pure rhetoric. They are most likely meant as a type of psychological warfare, because Iran cannot afford direct conflict with Israel.

Although Iran is larger geographically and in terms of population, its military capacity is inferior. Even regarding missile capabilities, which Iranian generals boast about, Israel’s are greater in range and number.

What fundamentally changes the balance of power is Israel’s nuclear capacity. It is widely believed to have some 200 nuclear warheads that can be used with intercontinental ballistic missiles, as well as nuclear-armed submarines.

As such, Iran’s policy toward Israel is to not strike first, as doing so would be suicidal for the ruling political establishment, whose main objective is to maintain power. It would be more effective to fight Israel via its Lebanese Shiite proxy Hezbollah.

Tehran’s repeated boasting about IRGC capabilities is aimed at invoking nationalist sentiment among the public, because Iranian leaders know that the overwhelming majority of Iranians are dissatisfied with the hardliners and the political establishment.

Kazem, 29, PhD student majored in public health, pointed out “I would like to see a regime change in Iran, but I want Iran, ruled by any government even the current clergies, to be stronger than any country in the region including Israel. Iran should be the most powerful nation in the region militarily, technologically and economically as it was under Shah era or thousands of years of the Persian empire”.

In addition, IRGC attempts to maintain and increase the budget allocated to it by showing that it is an indispensable and a must-have force to protect Iranians.

This method has been successful, as polls have repeatedly shown that many Iranians who oppose the political establishment still favor their country becoming a nuclear power or being more powerful than any other country in the region.

Finally, Khamenei and senior cadre of IRGC are appealing to the nationalistic sentiments of Iranians to win their votes by showing that IRGC is a must-have force to protect Iranians and project Iran’s prowess. They are also recalibrating the domestic balance of power, making it clear that they are the final decision-makers. They are appealing to their hardline social base by showing it that they continue to prioritize the values of the 1979 revolution (such as opposing Israel and the US) over other issues, including national interests. And, they are sending a message that the nuclear agreement does not mean Iran would make fundamental changes in its socio-political and socio-economic policies.

Read More